Home Page!

Enter the world of CIRCLES!

This is an archive of intense discussions. All issues affecting the position of women in the Church were explored in debate. At the moment such interaction takes place on our FACEBOOk page. To visit it, click here!

In CIRCLES we now offer full records of our discussions on 375 (!!) topics in 375 distinct discussion lines. They present facts and also reveal how people really feel about the situation in the Church. We recommend them to you for serious study.

Our random sampling shows we have guests from all over the world.

 2010 News Central, Items of Interest

Change Page: << < ..11121314151617 | Showing page 17 of 17, messages 321 to 326 of 326
Author Message
Sophie

  • Total Posts : 15488
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 18/01/2007
  • Status: offline
Re:2010 News Central, Items of Interest - 24/12/2010 06:40:52 ( #321 )
The Women's Circle at Brescia College, London Ontario, Canada is once again 
hosting the Bright Festival this year, February 11th to 13th, 2011.   Registration is now open. 

Please see full details: http://www.brescia.uwo.ca/thecircle/brigit.htm 

Mary Condren has resourced this festival now for the past three years and 
last year the highlight of the event was the sight of an eighty two year old 
nun, and a Wiccan Crone dancing together on the floor during the ceilidh 
(festival) on the Saturday night! 

Since Brigit was a bridge builder, the festival aims to be inclusive of all 
traditions and approaches to Brigit in her manifestation as goddess, saint, 
nun, and feminist revolutionary. 

The format of the festival is based on similar festivals held in Ireland 
over the past twenty years, and is greatly enhanced by Canadian input. 

Please be so kind as to circulate this information among anyone whom you 
think might be interested. 
Sophie

  • Total Posts : 15488
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 18/01/2007
  • Status: offline
RE: 2010 News Central, Items of Interest - 25/12/2010 11:14:40 ( #322 )




On behalf of the Team at womenpriests.org, we wish you the very best of love, health peace and happiness during this holy season and in the new year!

with love and blessings,

~Sophie~
Guest
HsRJHnFsaIlWVcDVbd - 07/12/2011 07:22:40 ( #323 )
At last, someone comes up with the "right" awnser!
Guest
BHmSUPNDaOKJtUmDz - 09/12/2011 12:47:28 ( #324 )
Wow, your post makes mine look feelbe. More power to you!
Guest
nYnHwNacnIkFmelQQn - 09/03/2012 10:43:35 ( #325 )
OK, here are the Churche28099s claims (from the CCC, with oeotnftos): RBRThat was a nice collection of images, but you have not done any theology by merely citing images.In order to make a theological point rather than just be pointing to images as if they were self explanatory as regards ordaining women or not, please show your logic regarding- how the texts and interpretations are reliably relevant to the specific issue of the sex of those who may be ordained.- that there is only one possible meaning for these texts and it is the one regarding ordination- only one possible line of deduction for these texts and it is that regarding ordination.Otherwise, you are applying one possible insight regarding multivalent texts which may have nothing to do with the sex of who may be ordained. You can not prove that the texts mean what you claim they mean without showing both your axioms and you line of deduction. Citing images which you think are relevant does not make any point other than they are nice images. Citing the catechism does not make any point other than the images have been interpreted to mean what the catechism describes. That does not prove any relevancy to any theological point.Mistaken citation and interpretation leads to the type of error which the Church has admitted in regard to the movement of the earth.
Guest
QBotqeXfqCJ - 12/03/2012 05:43:52 ( #326 )
Tom, thanks for the opptrtunioy to explain. For context, I wrote after #113 the order seems to have gotten mixed up a bit. Fr. Ze28099s blog was referenced in #96: e2809cThere is some whining out there (mostly among liberals and aging-hippies) about the new translation we will start using by Advent 2011e280a6 whether the whiners like it or not.e2809d My reference to rosaries was just this: In my mind, people of faith will always seek and, thank God, find expression. Obedience to church teaching was expressed in 1960 by attendance at Mass. But, being there, praying the rosary was far more expressive of some peoplee28099s faith. Of course, I cane28099t really say what was in the ladiese28099 minds. But my Irish father was never without his rosary. But people havene28099t been saying rosaries during Mass for awhile.From very brilliant people here, I have learned that there is no clear consensus that this translation is going to be good for the English speaking people of God. It is becoming increasingly difficult for me to accept that people of good will are going to be told that, if they explain them well enough, they will be embraced by their fellow parishioners. If not, it wone28099t be because the translation is clumsy, it will be because our faith or our acceptance of authority is, somehow, lacking. I saw that reflected here. People who ask the hard questions, will become e2809cwhinerse2809d. Lacking the knowledge, background, and ability of Fr. Anthony, they will be quiet. I never thought it possible but, might faithful men and women praying the rosary during Mass reappear?27af
Change Page: << < ..11121314151617 | Showing page 17 of 17, messages 321 to 326 of 326

  Enter the code shown; Click image to reload.
Post Message Preview
Jump to:

Current active users
There are 0 members and 2 guests.
Icon Legend and Permission
  • New Messages
  • No New Messages
  • Hot Topic w/ New Messages
  • Hot Topic w/o New Messages
  • Locked w/ New Messages
  • Locked w/o New Messages
  • Read Message
  • Post New Thread
  • Reply to message
  • Post New Poll
  • Submit Vote
  • Post reward post
  • Delete my own posts
  • Delete my own threads
  • Rate post

© 2000-2009 ASPPlayground.NET Forum Version 3.6