CIRCLES
Forums  Register  Login  My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums 

Photo Gallery  Search  Calendars  "Give a Donation!"  FAQ  Ticket List  Log Out



Click on image on the right to see live counter of total visitors
as they come in, counting each by their unique IP address


Heroic Agents of Change - 2008

 
Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [ARCHIVE] >> Treasures for keeping >> Heroic Agents of Change - 2008 Page: [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Heroic Agents of Change - 2008 - 1/1/2008 7:26:00 PM   
Sophie


Posts: 14679
Score: 0
Joined: 18/1/2007
Status: offline
Dear friends,

For those among us who are new to our dialogues, this is a note of introduction about the purpose of this thread.

From a practical point of view, work for women's ordination includes labouring for cultural change. There is strong resistance to acknowledging the fact that God calls women to be Catholic priests. As workers for change, facing resistance is not an easy part of the journey. Despite the fact that work for justice is a noble endeavor, shunning, condemnation, abusive rhetoric and hostility are unfortunately among the responses we sometimes encounter as we forge ahead.

Though many are the tests of determination and committment, sources of inspiration are plentiful, too. We are not alone. Many brothers and sisters have travelled parallel journeys before us. Through the role models they provide, we can learn from and be inspired by them.

The life of Benazir Bhutto, her assassination, and its aftermath are very much in the news as I write this. Controversial as she was to some, when she spoke about her work for democracy, she explained that she understood herself to be a 'Daughter of Destiny.' From the time she was a young child, her father encouraged her to nourish herself with inspiration by reading the life stories of women such as Joan of Arc and Indira Gandhi. Benazir frequently said that besides her faith life, their stories served as sources of empowerment for her.

In that same vein, we gather here to read the stories of the world's inspiring and heroic agents of change. Though not necessarily connected to our Catholic faith community in name, through their works for truth and justice, they share a journey with us.

Please enjoy. If you have any questions, as always let me know.

~Sophie~

ps to old friends and members: I will soon be retiring the 2007 heroes thread to our archives. It will be moved to our 'Treasures for Keeping' forum.

< Message edited by Sophie -- 3/1/2008 9:29:50 PM >
Post #: 1
RE: Heroic Agents of Change - 2008 - 1/1/2008 7:28:53 PM   
Sophie


Posts: 14679
Score: 0
Joined: 18/1/2007
Status: offline
On this day January 1 in 1863 - US President Abraham Lincoln signed the Emancipation Proclamation:
  • declaring that slaves in Confederate states were free.  


Abraham Lincoln

< Message edited by Sophie -- 2/1/2008 2:09:16 PM >

(in reply to Sophie)
Post #: 2
RE: Heroic Agents of Change - 2008 - 1/1/2008 7:38:26 PM   
Sophie


Posts: 14679
Score: 0
Joined: 18/1/2007
Status: offline
Abraham Lincoln faces resistance and fall out because of the Emancipation ProclamationJanuary 1, 1863:


Abraham Lincoln and Sojourner Truth  
 
President Lincoln read the first draft of this document to his Cabinet members on July 22, 1862. After some changes, he issued the preliminary version on September 22, which specified that the final document would take effect January 1, 1863. Slaves in Confederate states which were not back in the Union by then would be free, but slaves in the Border States were not affected.

The most controversial document in Lincoln's presidency, its signing met with both hostility and jubilation in the North. After the preliminary version was made public, Lincoln noted:

It is six days old, and while commendation in newspapers and by distinguished individuals is all that a vain man could wish, the stocks have declined, and troops come forward more slowly than ever. This, looked soberly in the face, is not very satisfactory.

However, on the day he approved the final version, Lincoln remarked:

I never, in my life, felt more certain that I was doing right, than I do in signing this paper.

http://showcase.netins.net/web/creative/lincoln/speeches/emancipate.htm

(in reply to Sophie)
Post #: 3
RE: Heroic Agents of Change - 2008 - 1/1/2008 7:47:54 PM   
Sophie


Posts: 14679
Score: 0
Joined: 18/1/2007
Status: offline
Dear friends

If you are new to womenpriests.org,  you might be surprised to notice that the issue of slavery gets a fair bit of press in our dialogue threads. Anticipating that you might be wondering 'why?'  and asking 'what is the connection between slavery and women's ordination?', the answer is this.

Defenders of the Vatican ban prohibiting women's ordination argue that:
  • the ban against women priests has always been part of Church teaching
  • the Vatican does not make mistakes.


Hmmm.  At first blush, these seem like good points.  But the facts actually are these.  The Vatican does not always get things 'right' on first strike.  The history of Church teachings show many instances where, as consciences are illuminated by Christ's light and understanding becomes clear, necessary evolutions have been implemented by the Vatican so as to bring our faith community into a closer walk with Christ.

The subject of slavery provides just one example of such an evolution in teaching. Throughout most of our ecclesiastical history, the Vatican clearly and adamantly taught that slavery was in accord with both divine and natural law.  It took the courage and work of abolitionists to bring about a change in teaching and law in both Church and society.


Am I not a man and a brother?
From the title page to
abolitionist Anthony Benezet's
book Some Historical Account of Guinea, London, 1788

We know that society in general, though painfully resistant, accepted change in views on slavery a little more quickly than did the Vatican.  For instance, the British House of Commons passed 'The Abolition of the Slave Trade Act on March 25, 1807.  The nation of Cuba banned slavery as early as 1824, and in 1837, the American Elijah Lovejoy continued working for abolition in his country. The Vatican on the other hand, was in 1866  still endorsing and teaching that slavery was justifiable in the eyes of God.  As a matter of historical record we know:


1866 AD: The Holy Office in an instruction signed by Pope Pius IX declares: Slavery itself, considered as such in its essential nature, is not at all contary to the natural and divine law, and there can be several just titles of slavery, and these are referred to by approved theologians and commentators of the sacred canons … It is not contrary to the natural and divine law for a slave to be sold, bought, exchanged or given". 

Through an evolution of understanding of Truth and in the progress of time, today the Vatican categorically condemns slavery as an offense to human dignity.

In the same way -- through an evolution of understanding of Truth -- our community is beginning to learn that the exclusion of women from priesthood is not of God.  The exclusion of women is offensive to human dignity.  Exclusion, like slavery, constitutes a serious error on the part of teaching authority. 

Slavery is not the only example where an evolution in understanding has occurred. For more about this, see our documents available:

Because our Church (Vatican included) has a proven capacity to embrace necessary evolutions in teachings (for example, about slavery) so as to journey more closely with Truth,  we know we have the capacity to move forward in accepting women priests. While Truth never changes, to attempt a defense of exclusion of women from Holy Orders on the basis that 'this is the way it always has been' is on its own not a sound argument.  

Please let me know if you have any questions.

with love and blessings,

~Sophie~

< Message edited by Sophie -- 1/1/2008 7:56:26 PM >

(in reply to Sophie)
Post #: 4
RE: Heroic Agents of Change - 2008 - 1/1/2008 7:57:38 PM   
Sophie


Posts: 14679
Score: 0
Joined: 18/1/2007
Status: offline
The following historical chart shows the evolution in Church teachings about slavery....going from condoning slavery right up to today...an outright and proper condemnation of it! 

362 AD: The local Council at Gangra in Asia Minor excommunicates anyone encouraging a slave to despise his master or withdraw from his service. (Became part of Church Law from the 13th century).

354-430 AD: St. Augustine teaches that the institution of slavery derives from God and is beneficial to slaves and masters. (Quoted by many later Popes as proof of "Tradition".)

650 AD: Pope Martin I condemns people who teach slaves about freedom or who encourage them to escape.

1089 AD: The Synod of Melfi under Pope Urban II imposed slavery on the wives of priests. (Became part of Church Law from the 13th century).

1179 AD: The Third Lateran Council imposed slavery on those helping the Saracens.

1226 AD: The legitimacy of slavery is incorporated in the Corpus Iuris Canonici, promulgated by Pope Gregory IX which remained official law of the Church until 1913. Canon lawyers worked out four just titles for holding slaves: slaves captured in war, persons condemned to slavery for a crime; persons selling themselves into slavery, including a father selling his child; children of a mother who is a slave.

1224-1274 AD: St.Thomas Aquinas defends slavery as instituted by God in punishment for sin, and justified as being part of the ‘right of nations’ and natural law. Children of a slave mother are rightly slaves even though they have not committed personal sin! (Quoted by many later Popes).

1435 AD: Pope Eugenius IV condemns the indiscriminate enslavement of natives in the Canary Islands, but does not condemn slavery as such.

1454 AD: Through the bull Romanus Pontifex, Pope Nicholas V authorises the king of Portugal to enslave all the Saracen and pagan peoples his armies may conquer.

1493 AD: Pope Alexander VI authorises the King of Spain to enslave non-Christians of the Americas who are at war with Christian powers.

1537 AD: Pope Paul III condemns the indiscriminate enslavement of Indians in South America. 

1548 AD: The same Pope Paul III confirms the right of clergy and laity to own slaves.

1639 AD: Pope Urban VIII denounces the indiscriminate enslavement of Indians in South America, without denying the four ‘just titles’ for owning slaves.

1741 AD: Pope Benedict XIV condemns the indiscriminate enslavement of natives in Brazil, but does not denounce slavery as such, nor the importation of slaves from Africa.

1839 AD: Pope Gregory XVI condemns the international negro slave trade, but does not question slavery as such, nor the domestic slave trade.

1866 AD: The Holy Office in an instruction signed by Pope Pius IX declares: Slavery itself, considered as such in its essential nature, is not at all contary to the natural and divine law, and there can be several just titles of slavery, and these are referred to by approved theologians and commentators of the sacred canons … It is not contrary to the natural and divine law for a slave to be sold, bought, exchanged or given".


The turn around

1888 AD: Pope Leo III condemns slavery in more general terms, and supports the anti-slavery movement.

1918 AD: The new Code of Canon Law promulgated by Pope Benedictus XV condemns ‘selling any person as a slave’. (There is no condemnation of ‘owning’ slaves, however).

1965 AD: The Second Vatican Council defends basic human rights and denounces all violations of human integrity, including slavery (Gaudium et Spes, no 27,29,67).

(in reply to Sophie)
Post #: 5
RE: Heroic Agents of Change - 2008 - 1/1/2008 8:01:01 PM   
Sophie


Posts: 14679
Score: 0
Joined: 18/1/2007
Status: offline
Dear friends, 

The Vatican's Prefect for the Congregation of the Doctrine of Faith, Cardinal Levada (this is the office Pope Benedict XVI held just prior to becoming pope -- Cardinal Ratzinger is how we knew him then) explains the change in Church teaching about slavery:




William Cardinal Levada
Current Prefect for the
Congregation of the Doctrine of Faith

There is a long tradition in the church of accepting the institution of slavery, but in the light of the repeated teachings of modern popes and the Second Vatican Council on the dignity of the human person, church teaching has evolved from acceptance of slavery as part of the human condition to its eventual condemnation.


Those of us working for the ordination of women generously applaud the Vatican for finally getting it right in endorsing a categorical condemnation of slavery in its modern teachings.  Thanks to the agents for change who courageously worked for abolition, the Vatican  finally saw the light! 

Please join us now in this campaign as we work towards conversion of the Vatican... encouraging them to see the light that women do have a place as deacons, priests, bishops and even popes within our Church.  We appreciate your presence here!  Welcome!  Please explore and enjoy our site.  If you have any questions, let me know.

with love and blessings,

~Sophie~

(in reply to Sophie)
Post #: 6
RE: Heroic Agents of Change - 2008 - 1/1/2008 8:10:13 PM   
Sophie


Posts: 14679
Score: 0
Joined: 18/1/2007
Status: offline










(in reply to Sophie)
Post #: 7
RE: Heroic Agents of Change - 2008 - 1/1/2008 8:18:42 PM   
Sophie


Posts: 14679
Score: 0
Joined: 18/1/2007
Status: offline

(in reply to Sophie)
Post #: 8
RE: Heroic Agents of Change - 2008 - 1/1/2008 8:31:21 PM   
Sophie


Posts: 14679
Score: 0
Joined: 18/1/2007
Status: offline
quote:

From a practical point of view, work for women's ordination means labouring for cultural change.  There is strong resistance to the fact that God calls women to be Catholic priests.  Facing resistance is not an easy part of the journey. 


Dear friends,

 In my own experience, the above sentences at times have better captured understatement than they do truth itself!  It has been helpful for me to learn something about the dynamics of cultural change.  Recognising patterns has sometimes helped things seem a little less daunting. 

As the shift in human culture progresses, we know that two dynamics can be expected:
  • Conservative elements of society will resist change. In periods of disruption, conservative elements of society will seek to preserve dominant existing views by fiercely resisting the emerging change. Many examples of such resistance exist, e.g., the woman's rights movement, the ending of slavery, the Copernican revolution, quantum mechanics, Darwinian evolution, global climate change, etc. Resistance can delay the inevitable shift, but will not prevent it once enough people have experienced its benefits.
  • Times will seem chaotic and random.  This is a sign that the system is undergoing a transformation to a more elegant and sophisticated form. The polarization and conflict accompanying such a shift can be disquieting, confusing. Problems may seem to overpower solutions. That is because, in social systems, old ways of doing things, old paradigms and worldviews are becoming inadequate, and are no longer addressing current situations. The hopeful part rests in knowing that these are signs that something new and better is trying to emerge.

If you are interested in learning about this, we do have several articles in our thread, The Dynamics of Change.  More to follow!

with love and blessings,

~Sophie~  


(in reply to Sophie)
Post #: 9
RE: Heroic Agents of Change - 2008 - 1/1/2008 8:35:37 PM   
Sophie


Posts: 14679
Score: 0
Joined: 18/1/2007
Status: offline
Dear friends,

Where do we fall in?  The late Dr. Everett Rogers, in his seminal work on the Diffusion of Innovations, refined understanding by identifying five categories of responders or adopters to the process of change.  The dominant characteristics of each of the five types, in their order of response is:

1. Innovators: initiate the response

  • Venturesome people, cosmopolitan, with broad experience
  • Likely to be well traveled and world-wise
  • Often have control of substantial financial resources, enabling them to take risks and survive inevitable failures
  • Find a rash, daring and risky lifestyle attractive

2. Early Adopters: modify and adopt the response

  • Respected by peers
  • Embody the successful, discrete use of new ideas
  • Have the greatest degree of opinion leadership
  • Relationships and influence tend to be local, based in and related to a smaller geographic or social system

3. Early Majority: cautious and sure

  • "Be not the first by which the new is tried, nor the last to lay the old aside" represents the attitude of this group
  • Deliberate
  • Interact frequently with peers, but seldom hold positions of opinion leadership
  • Represent approximately one third of the members of any social system

4. Late Majority: conservative

  • Skeptical of new ideas and innovation
  • Intolerant of uncertainty
  • Motivated by peer pressure and economic necessity
  • Also represent about one third of a social system

5. Laggards: the last to respond

  • Conservative traditionalists
  • Reference point is what worked in the past
  • Aware of a new idea long before adopting it
  • Must be absolutely sure that a new idea or innovation will not fail before they are willing to adopt it
  • Frequently occupy precarious economic positions, forcing them to be extremely cautious in adopting innovations

For me, learning more about the underlying patterns has been somehow both reassuring and illuminating.  While it might seem at times that hostility has been aimed at 'me,' this doesn't tell the whole story...especially in the Church.

with love and blessings,

~Sophie~

(in reply to Sophie)
Post #: 10
RE: Heroic Agents of Change - 2008 - 1/1/2008 9:00:50 PM   
Sophie


Posts: 14679
Score: 0
Joined: 18/1/2007
Status: offline
On this day January 1 in 1990 - His Holiness Pope John Paul II exhorts Christians to respect Nature, to preserve natural resources, and to stop environmental destruction.


Pope John Paul II

"Today the ecological crisis has assumed such proportions as to be the responsibility of everyone..."
  • Message of Pope John Paul II for the Celebration of the World Day of Peace,  January 1, 1990: Peace with God the Creator, Peace with All of Creation

http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/messages/peace/documents/hf_jp-ii_mes_19891208_xxiii-world-day-for-peace_en.html

(in reply to Sophie)
Post #: 11
RE: Heroic Agents of Change - 2008 - 2/1/2008 1:18:47 AM   
Sophie


Posts: 14679
Score: 0
Joined: 18/1/2007
Status: offline
Born January 1 in 1876: Harriet Brooks, Canadian physicist

Harriet Brooks (1876-1933) was the first Canadian woman nuclear physicist. She is most famous for her research on nuclear transmutations and radioactivity. Ernest Rutherford, who guided her graduate work, regarded her as being next to Marie Curie in the calibre of her aptitude.

 
Harriet Brooks: 1876-1933

She was born in Exeter, Ontario on New Year's Day, 1876. She graduated with B.A. in mathematics and natural philosophy from McGill University in 1898.

She was the first graduate student of Ernest Rutherford (then professor at McGill University), under whom she worked immediately after graduating. With him she worked on Electricity and Magnetism for her Master's degree in 1901. She was the first ever woman at McGill to receive a Master's degree.

After her Master's again under Rutherford she also did a series of experiments to determine the nature of the radioactive emission from thorium. These experiments served as the foundation for the development of nuclear science.

She was among the first persons to discover radon and to try to determine its atomic mass. For a brief period she also worked under the supervision of Marie Curie.

In 1907 she married Frank Pitcher and left the field of physics since in those days it was mandatory in universities for any woman to resign from her job after getting married.

An obituary for Harriet Brooks was published by the New York Times on April 18, 1933, recording that she had died the previous day in Montreal at the age of 56, crediting her as the "Discoverer of the Recoil of Radioactive Atom." Brooks is considered one of the leading women of her time in the field of nuclear physics, second only to Marie Curie.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harriet_Brooks

(in reply to Sophie)
Post #: 12
RE: Heroic Agents of Change - 2008 - 2/1/2008 1:23:02 AM   
Sophie


Posts: 14679
Score: 0
Joined: 18/1/2007
Status: offline
More information about Harriet Brooks and her departure from the field of physics because of legislation making it mandatory in universities for any woman to resign from her job after getting married:

Brooks' M.A. was the first awarded to a woman at McGill University. (McGill did not have a Ph.D. program until 1909.)

She planned to marry in 1906. She was teaching physics in Barnard College, and had to confront the problem that women teaching in women's colleges were obliged to resign their positions when they married. At Barnard the Dean's rule stated that "the College cannot afford to have women on the staff to whom the college work is secondary; the College is not willing to stamp with approval a woman to whom self-elected home duties can be secondary." Margaret Maltby was chair of the Physics Department, and pleaded with the Dean not to force Brooks to resign, but to no avail. Eventually Brooks resigned her position, probably more because of the awkwardness of the situation than because of her impending marriage since that had been canceled.

Having left Barnard, Brooks sailed for Europe and worked in the laboratory of Pierre and Marie Curie. (See Rayner-Canham biography below.) In 1907 she married Frank Pitcher, and did not continue a career in physics. They had three children.

In objection to being asked to resign if she were to marry, Brooks wrote in 1906:
    I think it is a duty I owe to my profession and to my sex to show that a woman has a right to the practice of her profession and cannot be condemned to abandon it merely because she marries. I cannot conceive how women's colleges, inviting and encouraging women to enter professions can be justly founded or maintained denying such a principle. [35 MRC]

RECOMMENDED READING
Biography of Harriet Brooks by Marlene F. Rayner-Canham and Geoffrey W. Rayner-Canham, Harriet Brooks: Pioneer Nuclear Scientist, McGill-Queen's University Press, Montreal 1992.[35 MRC]

http://www.physics.ucla.edu/~cwp

< Message edited by Sophie -- 2/1/2008 9:46:44 PM >

(in reply to Sophie)
Post #: 13
RE: Heroic Agents of Change - 2008 - 2/1/2008 1:49:14 AM   
Sophie


Posts: 14679
Score: 0
Joined: 18/1/2007
Status: offline
Born January 1, 1914, Noor Inayat Khan, Indian princess, and SOE agent, awarded the George Cross

Noor-un-Nisa Inayat Khan (January 1,1914, Moscow- September 13, 1944, Dachau concentration camp), usually known as Noor Inayat Khan, was a British Special Operations Executive agent in World War II of Indian origin and the first female radio operator to be sent into occupied France to aid the French Résistance.
 

Noor Inayat Khan
 
Early years
 
Noor was the eldest of four children. Her father Hazrat Inayat Khan came from a princely Indian Muslim family (he was a great-grandson of Tipu Sultan, the famous eighteenth century ruler of Mysore) and lived in Europe as a musician and a teacher of Sufism. Her mother Ora Meena Ray Baker Noor was an American from Albuquerque, New Mexico, who had met Inayat Khan during his travels in the United States. She was the half-sister of American yogi and scholar, Pierre Bernard (yogi), her guardian at the time she met Hazrat Inayat Khan.  Noor Inayat Khan's eldest brother Vilayat Inayat Khan later became head of the Sufi Order International, which was founded by their father.

In 1914, shortly before the outbreak of the First World War, the family left Russia for London and lived in Bloomsbury, while Noor attended kindergarten at Notting Hill. In 1920, they settled in France, moving into a house in Suresnes near Paris, a gift from a benefactor of the Sufi movement.

After the death of her father in 1927, Noor had to take added responsibility for her grief-stricken mother and her younger siblings. The young girl, described as quiet, shy, sensitive, and dreamy, studied child psychology at the Sorbonne and music at Paris conservatory under the famous Nadia Boulanger, composing for harp and piano.



She started a career of writing poetry and children's stories and became a regular contributor to children's magazines and French radio. In 1939 her book 'Twenty Jataka Tales', inspired by the Jātaka tales of Buddhist tradition, was published in London.

After the outbreak of World War II, when France was overrun by German troops in 1940, the family fled from Paris to Bordeaux and from there by sea to London, landing in Falmouth on 22 June 1940.

Wartime activities
 
Although Noor Inayat Khan was deeply influenced by the pacifist teachings of her father, she decided to help defeat Nazi tyranny. So on 19 November 1940 she joined the Women's Auxiliary Air Force (WAAF), to be trained as a wireless operator.



Two years later she was recruited to join F (France) Section of the Special Operations Executive and in early February 1943 she was posted to the Air Ministry, Directorate of Air Intelligence, seconded to First Aid Nursing Yeomanry (FANY), and sent to Wanborough Manor, near Guildford in Surrey, from there to various other SOE schools for training, including STS 5 Winterfold, STS 36 Boarmans and STS 52 Thame Park. During her training she took on the name Nora Baker.

Despite not completing her training and the mixed opinions about her level of intelligence and the suitability of her temperament for the task, her fluency in French and competency in wireless operation made her the strongest candidate in response to the urgent Parisian request for further help.

On 16/17 June, 1943 cryptonymed 'Madeleine'/W/T operator 'Nurse' and under the cover identity of Jeanne-Marie Regnier, Assistant Section Officer Inayat Khan was flown to landing ground B/20A 'Indigestion' in Northern France on a night landing double Lysander operation, code named Teacher/Nurse/Chaplain/Monk.



She traveled to Paris, and together with two other women (Diana Rowden, code named Paulette/Chaplain, and Cecily Lefort, code named Alice/Teacher) joined the Physician network led by Francis Suttill, code named Prosper.

Over the next month and a half, all other Physician network radio operators were arrested by the Sicherheitsdienst (SD), but in spite of the danger and rejecting an offer to return to Britain, Noor chose to remain and continue transmitting as the last essential link between London and Paris.

Moving from place to place, she tried to escape capture while maintaining wireless communication with London. "She refused to abandon what had become the most important and dangerous post in France and did excellent work." It is mainly attributed to her efforts that the Physician network could be reconstructed.

Imprisonment and death
 
Finally Inayat Khan was betrayed to the Germans, either by Henri Dericourt or by Renée Garry. Dericourt (code name Gilbert) was a SOE officer and former French Air Force pilot who has been suspected of working as a double agent for the German Abwehr. Renée Garry was the sister of Emile Garry, Inayat Khan's organizer in the Physician network.

Allegedly she was paid 100,000 Francs, but acted mainly out of jealousy because she had lost the affection of SOE agent France Antelme to Noor.

On or around 1 October 1943 Inayat Khan was arrested and interrogated at the SD Headquarters at 84 Avenue Foch in Paris. Though SOE trainers had expressed doubts about Inayat Khan's gentle and unworldly character, on her arrest she fought so fiercely that SD officers were afraid of her and she was thenceforth treated as an extremely dangerous prisoner. There is no evidence of her being tortured, but her interrogation lasted over a month. During that time, she attempted escape twice. Hans Kieffer, the former head of Gestapo in Paris, testified after the war that she didn't give the Gestapo a single piece of information, but lied consistently.
 
Although Inayat Khan did not talk about her activities under interrogation, the SD found her notebooks, in which she had kept, contrary to security regulations, copies of all the messages she had sent as an SOE operative. Although she refused to reveal any secret codes, the Germans gained enough information from it to continue sending false messages imitating her.

As London failed to investigate properly anomalies in the transmissions which should have indicated they were sent under enemy control, three more agents sent to France were captured by the Germans at their parachute landing, among them Madeleine Damerment, who was later executed together with Noor Inayat Khan.

After refusing to sign a declaration not to make further flight attempts, Inayat Khan was taken to Germany on 27 November 1943 "for safe custody" and imprisoned at Pforzheim in solitary confinement as a so-called Nacht und Nebel-prisoner, i.e. without any contact with the outside world and in complete secrecy.


Noor's memorial plaque at the Dachau Memorial Hall
 
She was classified as 'highly dangerous' and shackled in chains most of the time. As the prison director testified after the war, Inayat Khan remained uncooperative and continued to refuse to give any information on her work or her fellow operatives.

On September 11, 1944, Noor Inayat Khan and three other SOE agents from Karlsruhe prison, Yolande Beekman, Eliane Plewman and Madeleine Damerment, were moved to the Dachau Concentration Camp.

In the early hours of the morning, 13 September 1944, the four women were executed by a shot to the head. An anonymous Dutch prisoner emerging in 1958 contended that Noor Inayat Khan was cruelly beaten by the sadistic SS guard Wilhelm Ruppert before being shot from behind. Her last word was "Liberté".
 
Noor Inayat Khan was posthumously awarded a British mention in dispatches and a French Croix de Guerre with Gold Star. Khan was the third of three World War II FANY members to be awarded the George Cross, Britain's highest award for gallantry not on the battle field.

George Cross citation
 
The announcement of the award of the George Cross was made in the London Gazette of April, 1949. The full citation reads:

The KING has been graciously pleased to approve the posthumous award of the GEORGE CROSS to:

Assistant Section Officer Nora INAYAT-KHAN (9901), Women's Auxiliary Air Force.
 
Assistant Section Officer Nora INAYAT-KHAN was the first woman operator to be infiltrated into enemy occupied France, and was landed by Lysander aircraft on 16th June, 1943. During the weeks immediately following her arrival, the Gestapo made mass arrests in the Paris Resistance groups to which she had been detailed. She refused however to abandon what had become the principal and most dangerous post in France, although given the opportunity to return to England, because she did not wish to leave her French comrades without communications and she hoped also to rebuild her group. She remained at her post therefore and did the excellent work which earned her a posthumous Mention in Despatches.
 
The Gestapo had a full description of her, but knew only her code name "Madeleine". They deployed considerable forces in their effort to catch her and so break the last remaining link with London. After 3 months she was betrayed to the Gestapo and taken to their H.Q. in the Avenue Foch. The Gestapo had found her codes and messages and were now in a position to work back to London. They asked her to co-operate, but she refused and gave them no information of any kind. She was imprisoned in one of the cells on the 5th floor of the Gestapo H.Q. and remained there for several weeks during which time she made two unsuccessful attempts at escape. She was asked to sign a declaration that she would make no further attempts but she refused and the Chief of the Gestapo obtained permission from Berlin to send her to Germany for "safe custody". She was the first agent to be sent to Germany.
 
Assistant Section Officer INAYAT-KHAN was sent to Karlsruhe in November; 1943, and then to Pforsheim where her cell was apart from the main prison. She was considered to be a particularly dangerous and unco-operative prisoner. The Director of the prison has also been interrogated and has confirmed that Assistant Section Officer INAYAT-KHAN, when interrogated by the Karlsruhe Gestapo, refused to give any information whatsoever, either as to her work or her colleagues.
 
She was taken with three others to Dachau Camp on the 12th September, 1944. On arrival, she was taken to the crematorium and shot.
 
Assistant Section Officer INAYAT-KHAN displayed the most conspicuous courage, both moral and physical over a period of more than 12 months.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noor_Inayat_Khan

(in reply to Sophie)
Post #: 14
RE: Heroic Agents of Change - 2008 - 2/1/2008 1:54:44 AM   
Sophie


Posts: 14679
Score: 0
Joined: 18/1/2007
Status: offline
Exotic British spy who defied Gestapo brutality to the end
By Alan Hamilton
The Times
The Times On Line
May 13, 2006

The story of a prince's daughter and the SS guard who tortured and shot her has been uncovered.




Noor-un-nisa Inayat Khan occupied "the principal and most dangerous post in France" until her capture and execution by the Nazis in 1944. Her diary identifies her prison-camp torturer.

SHE was one of the most beautiful, exotic and unlikely spies to serve the Allies in wartime Europe. Like so many others, she perished at the hands of the SS in Dachau concentration camp.

Research in British and German archives has uncovered the full story of Noor-un-nisa Inayat Khan, who was born in pre-revolutionary Moscow to an Indian mystic prince and an American woman. She joined Britain’s Special Operations Executive and was betrayed with her radio as she transmitted from occupied Paris.

When her 225-page personal file was released recently by the National Archives in London, it was found to contain one extraordinary fact: the name of the SS camp guard who beat her to a pulp before shooting her through the back of the head. Yet she never betrayed a secret and died with the single word liberté on her bruised and bleeding lips.

One of only three wartime women to be awarded the George Cross, the highest decoration for gallantry away from the field of battle, Noor is the least known. Her fellow Resistance workers have been commemorated in feature films: Odette Hallowes was played by Anna Neagle in Odette and Violette Szabo by Virginia McKenna in Carve Her Name With Pride.

There have been books about Noor, but new light will be shed on her short yet remarkable life in a Timewatch documentary to be shown on BBC Two next Friday.

In 1958, a former Dutch prisoner of the Nazis known as “A.F.” who witnessed Noor’s execution read her biography and wrote to its author, Jean Overton Fuller. He revealed her killer to be Wilhelm Ruppert, a sadistic SS guard at the camp, and he described Noor’s last moments on September 12, 1944.


"The SS undressed the girl and she was terribly beaten by Ruppert all over her body. She did not cry, neither said anything. When Ruppert got tired and the girl was a bloody mess he told her then he would shoot her. She had to kneel and the only word she said, before Ruppert shot her from behind through the head, was ‘liberté’.” She was 30 years old.

Even before her wartime service, Noor’s life was out of the ordinary. Descended from a Muslim prince who died resisting the British Raj, she spent her early childhood among the Tsarist nobility before the 1917 revolution forced her family to flee to France. When Paris fell to the Germans in 1940, they had to seek refuge again, this time in England.

Driven by ideals of freedom and calling herself Nora Baker, she volunteered for SOE, which specialised in dropping agents behind enemy lines. Trained at the secret Baker Street headquarters, she proved a poor recruit, being too clumsy, too emotional and too scared of handling weapons.

Bob Maloubier, another French refugee trained at Baker Street, sent home to become a successful saboteur and now aged 83, said yesterday:


Above all she was definitely a very brave lady. It was extremely tricky operating under the noses of the Germans.


Noor’s courage and determination outweighed her ineptitude, and her masters sent her into France with a radio set and the codename Madeleine on June 16, 1943.

From the start she was on the run, moving her radio all over Paris to transmit details of troop movements essential for the planning of the D-Day invasion. The Prosper underground network of which she was a vital link was quickly penetrated by the Germans, thanks to an SOE double agent, Henri Dericourt. She was ordered home, but declined to board the RAF Lysander sent for her and carried on transmitting as virtually the last link between the Resistance and London.

General Sir Colin Gubbins, the head of SOE, said that she occupied “the principal and most dangerous post in France”. She had remarkable luck; stopped by the Gestapo as she cycled with her radio, she persuaded them that it was a cine projector. But after 3½ months her luck ran out; she was betrayed by Renée Garry, the sister of one of her Resistance colleagues. Garry is thought to have been jealous of her role as an SOE agent.

When captured, Noor was carrying a codebook listing all her radio messages, sent and received, which allowed the Germans to send false messages to London for a time. But after the war the former head of the Gestapo in Paris said that despite interrogation and torture, Noor never told them a thing.

She had been dead eight years when her nephew, David Harper, was born, but from endless family chatter he feels as if he knew her. “She was a paradox. She was sensitive, a lover of music and poetry, a musician and writer of children’s stories. Yet she was terribly strong-willed and prepared to risk her life for a cause; she was fighting for an ideal, like so many others at that time,” he said.

SS Trooper Wilhelm Ruppert was tried for war crimes and executed by the Americans on May 29, 1946.

HEROINES OF THE RESISTANCE
  • Violette Szabo, born in Paris in 1921 to a French mother and English father, joined SOE after her French husband was killed at El Alamein. Landed at Cherbourg in 1943 to organise a Resistance movement that identified bombing targets. Returned to Limoges to co-ordinate sabotage of German communication lines for D-Day. Was captured four days after invasion. Executed at Ravensbrück in 1945.
  • Odette Hallowes, born Odette Brailly in Amiens in 1915, moved to England with her first husband in 1931. She offered SOE family photographs of the French coast, was landed on Riviera in 1942 as radio operator for the agent Peter Churchill, then was betrayed, imprisoned and tortured. She briefly married Churchill. Died at the home of her third husband, Geoffrey Hallowes, in Surrey in 1995.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-2177934_2,00.html

< Message edited by Sophie -- 2/1/2008 2:00:36 AM >

(in reply to Sophie)
Post #: 15
RE: Heroic Agents of Change - 2008 - 2/1/2008 2:04:01 AM   
Sophie


Posts: 14679
Score: 0
Joined: 18/1/2007
Status: offline
Dear friends,
 
A sidebar note of interest: The Vatican recently announced its intention to celebrate the twentieth anniversary of Pope John Paul II's September 30, 1988 Apostolic Letter, Mulieris Dignitatem -- his Encyclical on ‘the Dignity and Vocation of Women’. If you are new to Circles, you might not know about our new forum that serves as host facility for our www.womenpriests.org "Online Congress on 'Mulieris Dignitatem' -- Equal Dignity of Men and Women in Creation." 

The purpose is to provide information, academic material and create space for dialogue about the encyclical.
It is our hope that our on-line parallel Congress will ensure that the faithful, journalists, and reporters have an opportunity to hear 'the other side' -- balancing perspectives about the document. 

We have divided the encyclical into six sections which we have identified as meriting (sp?) separate examination and discussion. I will serve as Moderator.  Although some threads in the Congress might overlap with topics that are already running, our intention is to create special focus that parallels celebratory activities that will be running in Rome during 2008.  In each section, we will provide a separate page listing readings on our website.  And we will include reviews by a variety  of well-known theologians commenting on each section of the encyclical. Much more to follow!  I will keep you posted!
 
You can easily link into the Congress by clicking here: http://www.womenpriests.org/circles/tt.asp?forumid=22. THe Congress topic listings are also available on our Forum main page (available here: http://www.womenpriests.org/circles/default.asp)
 
If you have any questions, please let me know.
 
with love and blessings,
 
~Sophie~

(in reply to Sophie)
Post #: 16
RE: Heroic Agents of Change - 2008 - 2/1/2008 2:08:48 AM   
Sophie


Posts: 14679
Score: 0
Joined: 18/1/2007
Status: offline
Dear friends,

The story of Noor-un-Nisa Inayat Khan courage brings to mind a current discussion in our Congress.  Mulieris Dignitatem raises many questions about John Paul II's comprehension of women in the real world.  His mother died when he was very young.  He grew up without sisters in Poland in the very early twentieth century. In his encyclical, he expresses his view that a woman's vocation lies either in motherhood or virginity.  He identifies no parallel limitations for men. Did his own 'real life' experience limit his understanding of women's capacities and gifts? In 'real life,' is it true that women's vocations are expressed in either motherhood or virginity? JPII writes:

The woman's motherhood in the period between the baby's conception and birth is a biophysiological and psychological process which is better understood in our days than in the past and is the subject of many detailed studies. Scientific analysis fully confirms that the very physical constitution of women is naturally disposed to motherhood - conception, pregnancy and giving birth - which is a consequence of the marriage union with the man. At the same time, this also corresponds to the psychophysical structure of women. What the different branches of science have to say on this subject is important and useful, provided that it is not limited to an exclusively biophysiological interpretation of women and motherhood. (Mulieris Dignitatem § 18)

A question was raised in our Congress about what JPII meant when he referred to the “psychophysical structure of women”?   Our enquirer asked 'how is it different from the psychophysical structure of men?'

The story of Noor-un-Nisa Inayat Khan courage brings that discussion to mind. In the Congress we learned that the 'scientific analysis' referred to goes mainly back to a Dutch psychologist, F.J.J. Buytendijk who wrote a book De Vrouw [="Woman"], (published by Aula, Utrecht 1961) and which was eagerly picked up by such conservative theologians as Louis Bouyer and Hans Urs von Balthasar -- favourite theologians who influenced John Paul II. Buytendijk claims that a man's psychology is centered on his chest, and a woman's on her womb. In short, his view (pp 162 - 163 in the book) can be summarised as follows:

MAN - CHEST

  • chest considered as the massive and central bodiness of a man
  • man speaks from the chest (courage related to Coeur-heart), only if courage fails emotion sinks to the stomach
  • expanded chest: symbol of deed, aggression, creation (vegetative part suppressed)
  • arms symbol of power and muscle
  • male sickness: heart failure, angina pectoris, etc.

WOMAN - WOMB

  • womb consired as the massive and central bodiness of woman ('woman is a full-grown ovary')
  • woman speaks and thinks from the womb
  • womb experienced as a space of life, continuation, reproduction that a woman undergoes passively
  • breast (upward expansion of the womb) expression of softness,
    motherliness, youthfulness
  • female sicknesses: digestion, gallstones

When we study Buytendijk's analysis, we understand why it is called "psychophysical". It goes without saying that his 'analysis' is considered VERY questionable and based on the presumptions of his time.

In light of Noor-un-Nisa Inayat Khan's demonstrated courage, what do you think?  Is courage, as Buytendijk contends, a feature that distinguishes men from women?  Can men and women be sorted out and pigeon holed into neat categories as to giftedness and capacities?  I encourage you to join us in dialogue about this in our Congress thread, Women as Mothers You can pick up on point by clicking here: RE: Women as Mothers .  I look forward to hearing your viewpoints.
 
If you have any questions, please let me know.
 
with love and blessings,
 
~Sophie~

(in reply to Sophie)
Post #: 17
RE: Heroic Agents of Change - 2008 - 2/1/2008 2:24:13 AM   
Sophie


Posts: 14679
Score: 0
Joined: 18/1/2007
Status: offline
Died January 1, 2005: Shirley Chisholm, American politician 

Shirley Anita St. Hill Chisholm (1924-2005) was an American politician, educator and author.  A woman who fought for change in the 20th century, she was a Congresswoman, representing New York's 12th District for seven terms from 1968 to 1983. In 1968, she became the first African American woman elected to Congress. On January 23, 1972, she became the first African American candidate for President of the United States. She won 162 delegates. Other women who ran for President of the United States in 1972 include Linda Jenness and Evelyn Reed.


Shirley Chisholm
 
Born in Brooklyn, New York of a Barbadian mother and a Guyanese father, Shirley St. Hill spent part of her childhood in Barbados with her grandmother, and received an education in the British-run school system.

She later attended Brooklyn College and graduated with a Bachelor of Arts degree in 1946. While working as a teacher, Chisholm earned a Master's degree in elementary education from Teachers College, Columbia University. From 1953 to 1959, she was director of the Hamilton-Madison Child Care Center, and from 1959 to 1964, was an educational consultant for the Division of Day Care.

In 1964, Chisholm ran and was elected to the New York State Legislature. She then ran as the  Democratic candidate for New York's 12th District congressional seat and was elected to the House of Representatives in 1968, defeating Republican candidate James Farmer and becoming the first African-American woman elected to Congress.

As a freshman, Chisholm was assigned to the House Agricultural Committee. Given her urban district, she felt the placement was a waste of time and shocked many by demanding reassignment. She was then placed on the Veterans' Affairs Committee. Soon after, she voted for Hale Boggs as House Majority Leader over John Conyers. As a reward for her support, Boggs assigned her to the much-prized Education and Labor Committee. She was the third-highest ranking member when she retired.

Chisholm joined the Congressional Black Caucus in 1969, as one of its founding members. In 1972, she made a bid for the Democratic Party's presidential nomination, receiving 152 delegate votes, but ultimately losing the nomination to South Dakota Senator George McGovern. Chisholm's base of support was ethnically diverse and included the National Organization for Women. Among the volunteers who were inspired by her campaign was Barbara Lee, who would go on to become a congresswoman some 25 years later. (Currently, Lee has a couple of pieces of legislation that would honor Shirley Chisholm, including H Con Res 9, calling on the US Postal Service to create a stamp honoring her, and HR 176, which would create a program to encourage educational exchanges between the US and Caribbean nations.) Chisholm said she ran for the office "in spite of hopeless odds, . . . to demonstrate the sheer will and refusal to accept the status quo."

Chisholm created controversy when she visited rival and ideological opposite George Wallace in the hospital soon after his shooting in May 1972, during the 1972 presidential primary campaign. Several years later, when Chisholm worked on a bill to give domestic workers the right to a minimum wage, Wallace got her the votes of enough southern congressmen to push the legislation through the House. Throughout her tenure in Congress, Chisholm would work to improve opportunities for inner-city residents. She was a vocal opponent of the draft and supported spending increases for education, healthcare and other social services, and reductions in military spending. She announced her retirement from Congress in 1982, and was replaced by a fellow Democrat, Major Owens in 1983. After leaving Congress, Chisholm was named to the Purington Chair at Mount Holyoke College in Massachusetts, where she taught for four years. She was also very popular on the lecture circuit.

Chisholm was married to Conrad Chisholm from 1949 to 1977. Upon their divorce, she married Arthur Hardwick, Jr., who died in 1986.



Shirley Chisholm was a member of Delta Sigma Theta Sorority. In 1993, she was inducted into the National Women's Hall of Fame. Chisholm also authored two books, Unbought and Unbossed (1970) and The Good Fight (1973).

Chisholm retired to Florida and died on January 1, 2005. She is buried in Buffalo, NY. In 2005, Shirley Chisholm '72: Unbought and Unbossed, a documentary film chronicling Chisholm's 1972 bid for the Democratic presidential nomination, was aired on U.S. public television. Directed and produced by independent, black woman filmmaker Shola Lynch, the film was featured at the Sundance Film Festival in 2004. On April 9, 2006, the film was announced as a winner of a Peabody Award.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shirley_Chisholm

(in reply to Sophie)
Post #: 18
RE: Heroic Agents of Change - 2008 - 3/1/2008 1:44:28 AM   
Sophie


Posts: 14679
Score: 0
Joined: 18/1/2007
Status: offline
On this day January 2 in 2001 - Sila Calderón becomes the first female Governor of Puerto Rico.

Sila María Calderón Serra (born September 23, 1942) was the seventh Governor of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico from 2001 to 2005. She is the first and to date only woman ever elected to that office. Prior to being Governor, Calderón held various positions in the Government of Puerto Rico, including Secretary of State and Chief of Staff. She was also Mayor of San Juan, the Capital of Puerto Rico.



Sila María grew up in San Juan, Puerto Rico into an upper class family (her father was a successful ice cream industrialist and real estate developer) and attended high school at the Sacred Heart Academy in Santurce. In 1960 she attended College in New York where in 1964 she graduated with a degree in Political Science.

Political career
 
Her political career began in 1973 when she was named executive assistant to the Labor Secretary and Special Assistant to then Governor, Rafael Hernandez Colon. Calderón became the first woman Chief of Staff in Puerto Rico in 1985. Later, she served as Secretary of State, a position which includes the responsibilities of a Lieutenant Governor.

She resigned in 1989 to devote her efforts to non profit and community work, most notably the innovative Peninsula de Cantera Project, which sought to foster the grass roots redevelopment of one of the most poverty striken sectors of San Juan, located only steps away from the financial sector of the city. During those years, she also devoted time to some public service, appointed as President of the Board of the Puerto Rico Public Broadcasting Corporation. During those years, she also served on the board of major local corporations such as Banco Popular Pueblo International and helping non-profit organizations such as The Sister Isolina Ferré Foundation.

Mayor of San Juan
 
She returned to public life in 1995, running in the 1995 Popular Democratic Party primary for Mayor of San Juan, winning handily over her three opponents by a huge margin, and then being elected Mayor of the city of San Juan in 1996, becoming the second woman in the city's history to serve in that office and the first woman elected to the position. As mayor, she undertook one of the largest public works program in the city to date, sponsoring various urban redevelopment projects to revitalize Rio Piedras, Santurce, Condado and other deteriorated sections of the city. She also initiated a "Special Communities Program" to assist poor communities and foster community volunteering.

During her time as mayor of San Juan, she received numerous distinctions and was granted several high profile audiences, including one with then-president Bill Clinton. She also became one of the leading voices in the fight for the Island of Vieques, where the residents had undertaken a struggle against the U. S. Navy bombing practices.

In 2000 she set her sights for the governor's seat. She led the Popular Democratic Party (PPD) during a heated and close campaign for Governor against Carlos Pesquera (PNP) and Ruben Berrios (PIP). With her victory, she became the first elected female governor in the history of Puerto Rico.

Governor
 
Calderón's administration objectives dealt with issues such as Vieques, the fight against drugs and the extension to the rest of the island of the "Special Communities Programs". During her campaign for the governorship, she promised to "get the Navy out of Vieques in 60 days", but the Navy left as agreed in the historic Clinton-Rosselló agreement, on May 1, 2003. Just like another former Spanish colony in the Pacific, the Philippines, had done earlier under their first female president, Corazon Aquino. Calderon, like Aquino, was instrumental on dismantling American military presence on their islands.

Although a firm believer in the current political status of the island, an attempt to discuss mechanisms to resolve the status dispute that faces Puerto Rico among the three major political parties was unsuccessful.

Her administration was characterized by frequent changes of the members of her cabinet; including four different Police Superintendents. During her term, crime became a major issue as the local economy deteriorated when the government lost hundreds of millions of dollars of income, paid by the United States, for the lease of Puerto Rican land for military practices.

Calderón announced in the summer of 2003 that she would not seek re-election in the 2004 Puerto Rican elections. Her daughter, Sila Mari Gonzalez was elected to the Senate of Puerto Rico in November 2004 just as her mother completed her term of office as Governor. Sila Mari currently serves as Minority Whip in the Puerto Rico Senate and recently announced her retirement from politics, just as her mother did.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sila_Calder%C3%B3n

(in reply to Sophie)
Post #: 19
RE: Heroic Agents of Change - 2008 - 3/1/2008 2:44:41 AM   
Sophie


Posts: 14679
Score: 0
Joined: 18/1/2007
Status: offline
Born this day January 3 in 1793 - Lucretia Mott, American women's rights activist

Lucretia Coffin Mott (1793-1880) was an American Quaker minister, abolitionist, social reformer and proponent of women's rights. She is credited as the first American "feminist" in the early 1800s but was, more accurately, the initiator of women's political advocacy.



Early Life

Lucretia Coffin was born into a Quaker family in Nantucket, Massachusetts. She was the second child of seven by Thomas Coffin and Anna Folger. At the age of thirteen she was sent to a boarding school run by the Society of Friends, where she eventually became a teacher. Her interest in women's rights began when she discovered that male teachers at the school were paid twice as much as the female staff. On April 10, 1811, Lucretia married James Mott, another teacher at the school. Their first child died at age 5. Ten years later, she became a Quaker minister.

Early Anti-Slavery Efforts

Lucretia and her husband were both opposed to the slave trade and were active in the American Anti-Slavery Society. She moved to Philadelphia in 1821. She quickly became known for her persuasive speeches against slavery. Prior to her own involvement, many Quaker men had been involved in the abolitionist movement in the very early 1800s. Lucretia Mott was one of the first Quaker women to do advocacy work for abolition. She and her husband followed Elias Hicks in the "Great Separation" of American Quakerism in 1827 into the more liberal and mystical Hicksite branch, which drew away from the more evangelical and conservative Orthodox branch.


Executive Committee of the Pennsylvania Anti-Slavery Society, 1851. Standing left to right: Mary Crew, Edward M. Davis, Haworth Wetherald, Abigail Kimber, Miller McKim, Sarah Pugh. Seated left to right: Oliver Johnson, Margaret Jones Burleigh, Benjamin C. Bacon, Robert Purvis, Lucretia Mott, James Mott.

Mott's letters reflect her regular travels in the mid-nineteenth century throughout the East and Midwest as she addressed various reform organizations such as the Non-Resistance Society, the Anti-Slavery Convention of American Women as well as the quarterly and yearly Quaker meetings. Her letters not only express the thoughts of a public figure but they also show the anxieties and joys of a nineteenth-century woman. Forceful and intelligent, her letters also reflect Mott's character and Quaker background.

Like many Quakers including Hicks, Mott considered slavery an evil to be opposed. They refused to use cotton cloth, cane sugar, and other slavery-produced goods. With her skills in the ministry, she began to speak publicly for abolition, often traveling from her home in Philadelphia. Her sermons combined antislavery themes with broad calls for moral reform. Her husband supported her activism and they often sheltered runaway slaves in their home.

It should be noted that Quakers, when compared to other religious and social groups in America since its founding, were unusual in their equal treatment of women. They had rich history and singular respect from the majority of American people of those times, mostly due to their advocacy and martyrdom for being conscientious objectors to war, and later their anti-slavery efforts.

Mott was successful in her abolitionist lobbying and punctuated her career with teaching the ropes of representative government's political advocacy to women coming up as women's and abolitionist advocates. In the 1830s she helped establish two anti-slavery groups.

The International Anti-Slavery Convention

Mott spoke at the International Anti-Slavery Convention in London, England in June 1840. In spite of her status as one of six women delegates, Mott was not formally seated at the meeting because she was a woman. This led to the protest of other Americans advocates attending the convention, including William Lloyd Garrison and Wendell Phillips.

Elizabeth Cady Stanton and her activist husband Henry B. Stanton attended the convention while on their honeymoon. Stanton became angry when she couldn't see Mott as she spoke, as women in the audience were required to sit in a roped-off section hidden from the view of the men in attendance. Mott and Stanton became well acquainted at the convention, and Stanton later recalled: "We resolved to hold a convention as soon as we returned home, and form a society to advocate the rights of women." However, it was not until 1848 that Mott and Stanton organized the Women's Rights Convention at Seneca Falls, New York.
.
Seneca Falls
 
The Seneca Falls Convention in 1848 was the first American women's rights meeting. Stanton's resolution that it was "the duty of the women of this country to secure to themselves the sacred right to the elective franchise" was passed, and this became the focus of the group's campaign over the next few years. Mott was a signatory of the Declaration of Sentiments. While Elizabeth Cady Stanton is usually credited as the leader of that effort, it was Mott's mentoring of Stanton and their work together that organized the event. Lucretia's sister, Martha Coffin Wright also helped organize the convention and signed the declaration.

Opinions

Mott parted with the mainstream women's movement in one area, that of divorce. At that time it was very difficult to obtain divorce, and fathers were given custody of children. Stanton sought to make divorce easier to obtain and to safeguard women's access to and control of their children. The more conservative Mott opposed any significant legal change in divorce laws.



Mott's theology was influenced by Unitarians including Theodore Parker and William Ellery Channing as well as early Quakers including William Penn. She taught that "the kingdom of God is within man" (1849) and was part of the group of religious liberals who formed the Free Religious Association in 1867, with Rabbi Wise, Ralph Waldo Emerson and Thomas Wentworth Higginson. Her theological position was particularly influential among Quakers, as in the future many harked back to her positions, sometimes without even knowing it.

American Equal Rights Association
 
Elected as the first president of the American Equal Rights Association after the end of the Civil War, Mott strove a few years later to reconcile the two factions that split over the priorities between woman suffrage and black male suffrage. Ever the peacemaker, Mott tried to heal the breach between Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Susan B. Anthony and Lucy Stone over the immediate goal of the women's movement: suffrage for freedmen and all women, or suffrage for freedmen first?

Writing
 
In 1850, Mott wrote Discourse on Woman, a book about restrictions on women in the United States. She became more widely known after this. When slavery was outlawed in 1865, she began to advocate giving black Americans the right to vote. She remained a central figure in the women's movement as a peacemaker, a critical function for that period of the movement, until her death at age 87 in 1880.

Swarthmore
 
In 1864, Mott and several other Hicksite Quakers incorporated Swarthmore College, which today remains one of the premier liberal arts colleges in the United States.

Organizations
 
In 1866, Mott joined with Stanton, Anthony, and Stone to establish the American Equal Rights Association. She was a leading voice in the Universal Peace Union, also founded in 1866. The following year, the organization became active in Kansas where Negro suffrage and woman suffrage were to be decided by popular vote.

Death 
 
Mott died on November 11, 1880 in Abington, Pennsylvania and was buried in the Quaker Fairhill Burial Ground in North Philadelphia.  In 1983 she was posthumously inducted into the U.S. National Women's Hall of Fame.
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucretia_Mott

(in reply to Sophie)
Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [ARCHIVE] >> Treasures for keeping >> Heroic Agents of Change - 2008 Page: [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 Unicode

0.172