Sources of Matthew’s Gospel

Introduction
Gospel
Jesus Christ
Christ
Oral and written tradition
Tradition
The Gospel of Matthew
Matthew
The Gospel of Mark
Mark
The Gospel of Luke
Luke
The Gospel of John
John
The meaning for today
Interpretation

From ‘Notes on the Formation of the Gospels’, by John Wijngaards;
published in Background to the Gospels (Bangalore & Ann Arbor 1981)
and Together in My Name (London 1991).

It is crucial to understand that a Gospel like Matthew’s was not written from first to last by some author in his or her own style, as books are written in our own time. Rather, Matthew’s Gospel is a sequence of traditional texts strung together according to the plan of the evangelist.

Where did these traditional texts come from? What sources were used for writing the Gospel?

Though the final author moulded the material much more thoroughly than Mark, like Mark Matthew relied heavily on the traditions available to himself and, by and large, passed them on virtually untouched. Matthew relied mainly on two traditional sources which have been reconstructed by scholars:

  1. Ur-Mark. A collection of traditions focussing on what Jesus did: his miracles, disputes with Pharisees, his journeys, and-so-on.
  2. Quelle (German for Source). A collection of Jesus’ sayings, known to both Matthew and Luke.

Matthew’s dependence on the two main sources of tradition can be seen best in these comparative tables.

John Wijngaards

Return to Matthew overview?   Return to Gospel Formation overview?

Do you wish to translate this page via google translator?

You (i) first need to copy the URL of this page (from top bar of your browser), (ii) click on this link, (iii) paste the URL into the google converter. Then choose your language and click "translate".

Please, support our campaign
for women priests

 
Join our Women Priests' Mailing List
for occasional newsletters:
Email:
Name:
Surname:
City:
Country:
 
An email will be immediately sent to you
requesting your confirmation.