|
| Interaction | Academic Shelves | Medieval Theologians | Home | mss on Women Deacons | SITEMAP | feedback |
born 1290-?
Data published by John Hilary Martin, O.P.,The
Ordination of Women and the Theologians in the Middle Ages, published in
Escritos del Vedat 16 (1986) 87-143, here
pp. 107-108; also in , A History of Women and
Ordination, Volume 1, The Ordination of Women in Medieval Context,
ed. by Bernard Cooke and Gary Macy, the Scarecrow Press, London 2002, pp.
31-160, here pp. 87,141,167
Information on the author
William of Rubio, from the Franciscan Province of Aragon, was a student
at Paris between 1315 and 1325, possibly under Francis de la March. The
Franciscan General Chapter of Assisi, meeting in 1334, examined and approved
his commentary on the Sentences. No manuscript of his work survives,
which is curious in the light of its approval by the Chapter. We rely on an
edition published at Paris in 1518.
Latin Texts
Selections (paragraph numbering by John Wijngaards)
§ 1. "Quantum
ad tertium dicendum quod aliqui sunt illegitimi et inhabiles absolute et
simpliciter ad ordinem recipiendum; alii autem ad ipsum debite et congrue
recipiendum, et hoc ex divinis ordinatione. Hoc apparet quoniam omnis ille est
ad recipiendum ordinem illegitimus absolute qui si attentat recipere nihil
facit. Ille autem est illegitimus ad debite recipiendum qui licet possit ipsum
recipere absolute, non tamen sine peccato..."
F. Guilielmi de
Rubione venerabilis admodum patris et theologi facile doctissimi, provincia
Aragonlae quondam ministri Disputatorum in quatuor libros Magistri
Sentetiarum, 2 v. in 5, (Michaelis Conradi & Simonis Vincentii: Paris,
1518), IV Seen., dist. 25, q. 3 II: fol. 196 rb. "'
"In so far as the third issue is concerned, it is said that some are
illegitimate and unfit for the reception of orders absolutely and simply;
others, on the other hand, are [illegitimate and unfit] by aptness and by
suitability in regard to the same reception and that by divine command. This is
clear since every one who is absolutely illegitimate in regard to the reception
of orders if he attempts to receive it, nothing happens. One, on the other
hand, who is illegitimate for reception by aptness although he is able to
receive it absolutely, he may not without sin . . "
Commentary on the
Fourth Book of Sentences, dist. 25, q. 3 (Paris edition, 2: fol. 196 rb).
§ 2. "...aliqui sint simpliciter divinitus illegitimati ad nullo
modo posse aliquem ordinem recipiere apparet, quia cum, ut dictum est superius,
ecclesia nullum possit sua autoritate simpliciter et absolute illegitimare, per
consequens omnis simpliciter illegitimatus ad ordinum susceptionem est a Deo
illegitimatus."
ibid.
". . . It is clear that all those who are simply illegitimate by
divine will are in no way able to receive any order since as the church is not
able on its own authority simply and absolutely to make someone illegitimate,
as was said above, consequently anyone simply and absolutely illegitimate as
far as the reception of orders is concerned must have been made illegitimate by
God."
§ 3. "Sed
multi sint tales, ut omnis mulier. Sexus enim muliebris omnino impedit ordinis
susceptionem, quod non potest esse, ut videtur, nisi propter Divinam
ordinationem."
Ibid.
"But there are many of those [i.e. absolutely impeded from receiving
orders] as every woman is. In fact the gender of a woman totally impedes her
reception of orders; which could not be the case, as has been shown, except
through a divine decree [lit. ordination]."
§ 4. "Non
enim est verisimile quod ecclesia privasset totum muliebrem sexum eo quod
posset ipsi competere quod etiam esset ad salutern et utilitatem eius, sed
constat quod ordo esset ad salutem et ad utilitatem mulieris sicut et hominis
si competere ipsi posset; ergo ipsam et maxime totum sexum ecclesia sine eius
culpa aliqua non privasset. Confirmatus quia aut mulier secundum Divinum
beneplacitum et statutum est simpliciter et absoluta illegitima ad ordinum
susceptionem, aut non. Si primum ergo non obstante quocunque statuto ecclesiae
in contrarium ipsa posset recipere absolute ordines, quod est
falsum. Si autem ponatur secundum, sequitur
propositum, videlicet quod eius illegitimatio seu inhabitatio absoluta non est
ex ordinatione ecclesiae, sed Divina. Hoc etiam modo dicitur esse illegitimus,
videlicet absolute, omnis cui est impossibilis actus ordinis sicut est mutus."
Ibid. (unspoken)
"For it not likely that the church would deprive the entire sex of
women from something for which they were competent and which also would be for
their salvation and utility. But it is evident that orders would be for the
salvation and utility of women, as it is of men if women could be competent for
it. Therefore the church most certainly would not be able to deprive a woman
[lit. her] even less the whole sex without some sin on her part. This is
confirmed, since either a woman is simply and absolutely illegitimate in regard
to the reception of ordination according to divine will and by divine decree,
or she is not. If then, as was first said, a woman would be able to receive
orders absolutely without any law of the church obstructing to the contrary,
which is false. If the first [is true], not withstanding any contrary decree of
the Church woman would absolutely be able to receive orders, which is false. If
however the second alternative is true, then the proposition follows, namely
that the absolute illegitimacy or incapability of women is not from the
regulation of the church, but of God. In this way [the femal sex] are said to
be illegitimate, namely absolutely. An act of ordination is impossible for all
of them as it would be for a person who cannot speak."
Ibid.
edited and translated by John Wijngaards
Search our web
site
Support our
campaign
Sitemap
Contemporary
theologians
Overview Latin
Archive
Go back to home
page

Join our Women Priests' Mailing List
for occasional newsletters:
An email will be immediately sent to you
requesting your confirmation.

Please, credit this document
as published by www.womenpriests.org!