Rules of the sound interpretation of Sacred Scripture

Rules of the sound interpretation of Sacred Scripture

Christians in past centuries have committed flagrant acts of injustice, justifying their actions with biblical texts. They kept other human beings as slaves. They denied women their full rights. They favoured the rich above the poor. They colonised other races. This slide back into pagan practices is sad indeed, but even more scandalous was their claim to be following God’s will. Christians justified their unChristian behaviour with quotes from Scripture!

There is a well known saying among theologians that even the devil can quote Scripture (from Matthew 4,6). History confirms the danger. Hundreds of heresies have been proclaimed and thousands of blunders committed on the strength of Scripture texts that have been wrongly understood.

The inspired text needs to be read carefully. God speaks through human authors and what they say in his name follows all the rules of ordinary human language. God does not say more than the human author intended to say.

In the course of the centuries Catholic exegesis, with the approval of Church authorities, has formulated some important rules that help us understand the inspired message more accurately. Only by following these rules will we avoid the pitfalls so many have tumbled into.

Exegetical Rules

1. We must know what the human author wanted to say before we can come to any conclusions as to what God is telling us.

This is known as the rule of the “literal sense” (not the “literalist sense”!!). It has been endorsed by the Second Vatican Council.

2. In many texts we have to discern the teaching by analysing the literary form the scriptural author is using..

This rule, which follows from rule one, is known as the rule of the “literary form” . This too has been endorsed by the Second Vatican Council.

3. We may not ascribe statements or assertions to a biblical author which lie outside his intended scope.

The rule of the author's intended scope follows from the previous rules.

4. We have to distinguish substantial statements by the author from rationalizations and popular reasonings in which he expresses his own human opinions.

Failing to recognise rationalizations has often been the source of serious misunderstandings regarding the intention of scriptural authors.

John Wijngaards

Please, credit this document
as published by www.womenpriests.org!

This website is maintained by the Wijngaards Institute for Catholic Research.

The Institute is known for issuing academic reports and statements on relevant issues in the Church.

Wijngaards Institute for Catholic Research

Dear visitor, you are welcome to use our material. However: building up and maintaining this site costs money. We are a Charity and work mainly with volunteers, but find it difficult to pay our overheads. Please, become a Friend or support us with a donation. Also, as some of you recommended to us, we are exploring how to generate income by advertising. Please, support us in this effort and send us your suggestions.
John Wijngaards

Wijngaards Institute for Catholic Research

Miriam Duignan

Please, support our campaign
for women priests

Visit our new websites:

Natural Law and Conscience

Synod on the Family 2015

Catholics and Contraception

Join our Women Priests' Mailing List
for occasional newsletters:
An email will be immediately sent to you
requesting your confirmation.